Sensemaking of Organizational Rule Systems: Requirements for a Modeling Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7250/csimq.2026-48.06Keywords:
Organizational Rule System, Complex Adaptive System, Case Study, Thematic Analysis, Legal Design, Requirements EngineeringAbstract
Organizational rule systems, comprising internal rules, external regulations, and contractual obligations, pose significant sensemaking challenges for actors in heavily regulated sectors. For example, actors need to consider conflicts and incoherence among rules, how higher-level rules are refined by complementary rules at lower levels, and how rules are changed over time. This study aims to elicit requirements for a visual modeling method that supports practitioners who are not rule experts in comprehending and navigating such rule systems. Within the framework of design science research, the study uses a case study of the Swedish regulatory system for health data innovation. Data were collected through both semi-structured interviews and documents, and analyzed using theory-driven thematic analysis based on complex adaptive systems theory. The results include a thematic map and a structured set of requirements for the proposed modeling method. In summary, the requirements specify a method that allows the user to move up and down multi-level hierarchies, sometimes drilling deep into details, sometimes looking at high-level emerging patterns. These requirements lay the groundwork for designing and evaluating the modeling method.
References
K. E. Weick, K. M. Sutcliffe, and D. Obstfeld, “Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking,” Organization Science, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 409–421, 2005.
J. Stirna and A. Persson, Enterprise Modeling: Facilitating the Process and the People. Springer International Publishing, 2018.
K. Sandkuhl, J. Stirna, A. Persson, and M. Wißotzki, Enterprise Modeling: Tackling Business Challenges with the 4EM Method. Springer, 2014.
D. Karagiannis and H. Kuhn, “Metamodelling platforms,” in E-Commerce and Web Technologies, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2455, 2002, p. 182.
J. R. Turner and R. M. Baker, “Complexity Theory: An Overview with Potential Applications for the Social Sciences,” Systems, vol. 7, no. 1, article 4, 2019.
B. Ellis, “An overview of complexity theory: understanding primary care as a complex adaptive system,” in Handbook of Systems and Complexity in Health, 2013, pp. 485–494.
J. B. Ruhl and D. M. Katz, “Mapping law’s complexity with “Legal Maps”,” in Complexity Theory and Law, 2018.
J. Lindeberg, M. Henkel, and E. Svee, “Modelling Languages and CAS Concepts for Systematic Mapping Study,” 2024. Available: https://github.com/JoranL/organisational-rules/raw/main/supplementbir2024lindebergetal.ods
A. R. Hevner, S. T. March, J. Park, and S. Ram, “Design Science in Information Systems Research,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 75–106, 2004.
P. Johannesson and E. Perjons, An Introduction to Design Science. Springer, 2014.
K. Peffers, T. Tuunanen, M. A. Rothenberger, and S. Chatterjee, “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 45–77, 2007.
J. Lindeberg, M. Henkel, and E.-O. Svee, “What does complex adaptive systems theory mean for modelling of organisational rules?” in Joint Proceedings of the BIR 2024 Workshops and Doctoral Consortium, ser. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 3804, 2024, pp. 106–111. Available: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3804/short5m.pdf
E. van der Linden, K. Smit, M. Berkhout, and M. Zoet, “The business rule type jungle: An explorative analysis,” in BLED 2019 Proceedings, 2019. Available: https://aisel.aisnet.org/bled2019/24
Publications Office of the European Union, “ELI, the European Legislation Identifier: good practices and guidelines,” 2024. Available: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/514875b4-5efd-11e8-ab9c-01aa75ed71a1
C. Griffo, J. P. A. Almeida, and G. Guizzardi, “Legal Theories and Judicial Decision-Making: An Ontological Analysis,” in Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 330, 2020, pp. 63–76.
R. Hoekstra, J. Breuker, M. D. Bello, and A. Boer, “LKIF Core: Principled Ontology Development for the Legal Domain,” in Law, Ontologies and the Semantic Web, ser. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. vol. 188, 2009, pp. 21–52.
R. K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications, 2017.
M. Henkel, E. Perjons, K. F. Lappalainen, U. Fors, and C. M. Sjöberg, “Digitalization of Health and Social Care Collaboration: Identification of Problems and Solutions,” in Joint Proceedings of RCIS 2024 Workshops and Research Projects Track, ser. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 3674, 2024. Available: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3674/RP-paper8.pdf
Handbok för effektivare framtagning av medicintekniska produkter. Medtech4Health, Smartare Elektroniksystem, 2024 (in Swedish). Available: https://medtech4health.se/handbok-for-effektivare-framtagning-av-medicintekniska-produkter/
R. Lövström, M. Nymark, and H. Palm, “Hälsodatavägledningen,” 2024 (in Swedish). Available: https://halsodata.se/
“DIGIfor1healthSE – ett samarbete för hållbar tillgång och nyttjande av hälsodata,” SciLifeLab, Stockholm, online resource, 2025 (in Swedish).
V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006.
R. L. Ackoff, “The Art and Science of Mess Management,” Interfaces, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 20–26, 1981.
L. A. Zadeh, “Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. SMC-3, no. 1, pp. 28–44, 1973.
B. Aritua, N. J. Smith, and D. Bower, “Construction client multi-projects – A complex adaptive systems perspective,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 72–79, 2009.
R. Marion and M. Uhl-Bien, “Leadership in Complex Organizations,” The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 12, no.4, pp. 389–418, 2001.
D. Snowden, “Constraints,” 2022. Available: https://cynefin.io/wiki/Constraints
P. E. Plsek and T. Greenhalgh, “Complexity Science: The Challenge of Complexity in Health Care,” BMJ: British Medical Journal, vol. 323, no. 7313, pp. 625–628, 2001.
J. J. Colchester, Systems + Complexity An Overview. 1st ed. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2016.
D. S. Wilson, G. Madhavan, M. J. Gelfand, S. C. Hayes, P. W. B. Atkins, and R. R. Colwell, “Multilevel cultural evolution: From new theory to practical applications,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 120, no. 16, 2023.
D. H. Meadows, Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Earthscan, 2008.
S. W. Fraser and T. Greenhalgh, “Complexity Science: Coping with Complexity: Educating for Capability,” BMJ: British Medical Journal, vol. 323, no. 7316, pp. 799–803, 2001.
D. J. Snowden and M. E. Boone, “A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making,” Harvard Business Review, 2007. Available: https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making
I. Bider and E. Perjons, “Discovery Rules for Depicting Tacit Knowledge Usage and Management in Fractal Enterprise Models,” in Perspectives in Business Informatics Research, ser. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 529, 2024, pp. 209–224.
A. van Lamsweerde, “Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour,” in Proceedings Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, 2001, pp. 249–262.
T. Gorschek and C. Wohlin, “Requirements Abstraction Model,” Requirements Engineering, vol. 11, pp. 79–101, 2006.
Y. S. Lincoln and E. G. Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE, 1985.
European Commission, Shaping Europe’s digital future, “Sweden in the Digital Economy and Society Index,” DESI country profile 2022. Available: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi-sweden
O. Hanseth and K. Lyytinen, “Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet,” Journal of Information Technology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2010.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jöran Lindeberg, Martin Henkel, Åsa Smedberg, Eric-Oluf Svee (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
