Quantile Regression for Power Grid Damage Prediction

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7250/csimq.2026-48.04

Keywords:

Electrical Grid, Damage Prediction, Machine Learning, Quantile Regression, Climate Factors

Abstract

This article addresses the challenge of predicting electrical grid damage in the Latvian regions of Zemgale and Kurzeme using machine learning and quantile regression techniques. The study leverages a comprehensive dataset spanning 2009–2025, incorporating environmental, infrastructure, seasonal, and weather-related features. To handle the significant data imbalance, various spatial and temporal aggregation strategies are tested. Feature selection and aggregation are carefully tailored to preserve correlations between predictors and damage counts. The XGBoost algorithm, configured for quantile regression, is employed with extensive hyperparameter tuning and cross-validation. Results indicate that models trained at the maintenance-region scale (6-cell) achieve the best overall balance between accuracy and reliability, with a mean absolute error of 4.09 and an R2 of 0.53 for daily damage prediction. While the state region (2-cell) model excels in predicting high damage count events (30 or more), it also provides more precise minimum and maximum bounds, offering actionable uncertainty bounds for operational planning. The findings highlight the importance of spatial aggregation and feature engineering in improving predictive performance for rare-event forecasting in power grids. Several promising directions for further development have been identified, and the obtained results are sufficiently promising to support the application of the proposed methodology to broader geographical regions.

Supporting Agencies
This work was funded by the European Union’s NextGenerationEU instrument through the Latvia’s Recovery and Resilience Plan, project “Development of a new big data-driven surface power grid damage prediction system (ST ODA) for more efficient prevention of power supply disruptions.”

References

T. Zhao, E. Satoshi, M. Yue, M. Jensen, A. Marschilok, B. Nugent, B. Cerruti, and C. Spanos, “Machine Learning-based Dynamic Granular Electric Outage Forecasting,” in 2023 Resilience Week (RWS), 2023, pp. 1–5.

J. Li, Y. Gao, A. Lei, Y. Mei, W. Tao, L. Wang, T. Li, Y. Wang, and J. Liu, “Prediction of Power Failure Caused by Extreme Weather Based on Spatiotemporal Data,” in 2024 4th International Conference on New Energy and Power Engineering (ICNEPE), 2024, pp. 777–780.

L. Peter, K. Knezovic, M. Jawad, N. Katiyar, M. Subasic, and A. Shirsat, “Outage Prediction for Extreme Weather Events Based on Machine Learning,” in CIRED Chicago Workshop 2024: Resilience of Electric Distribution Systems, vol. 2024, 2025, pp. 305–309.

L. Prieto-Godino, C. Peláez-Rodríguez, J. Pérez-Aracil, J. Pastor-Soriano, and S. Salcedo-Sanz, “Predicting Weather-Related Power Outages in Large Scale Distribution Grids with Deep Learning Ensembles,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 170, article 110811, 2025.

S. Zhong, X. Qin, J. Li, J. Yao, J. Li, and Z. Lin, “Research on Intelligent Fault Identification and Power Outage Prediction Algorithm of Power Grid under Extreme Weather Based on Deep Learning,” in 2025 International Conference on Smart & Sustainable Technology (INCSST), 2025, pp. 1–7.

A. Stasko, E. Otomers, A. Bondarenko, R. Sirmais, K. K. Vēliņš, D. Bļizņuks, and I. Birzniece, “Baseline Study of Machine Learning Applications for Power Grid Damage Prediction in Latvia,” Automatic Control and Computer Sciences, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 425–438, 2026.

R. Koenker, Quantile Regression, ser. Econometric Society Monographs. Cambridge University Press, 2005.

A. R. Hevner, S. T. March, J. Park, and S. Ram, “Design Science in Information Systems Research,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 75–105, 2004.

K. Peffers, T. Tuunanen, M. Rothenberger, and S. Chatterjee, “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems research,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 45–77, 2007.

R. Tervo, J. Karjalainen, and A. Jung, “Short-term prediction of electricity outages caused by convective storms,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 8618–8626, 2019.

E. S. Kiel and G. H. Kjølle, “A Bayesian Network Approach to Predicting Transmission Line Down Times,” in Proceedings of the 30th European Safety and Reliability Conference and 15th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference, 2020, p. 3725–3732.

C. Shearer, “The CRISP-DM Model: The New Blueprint for Data Mining,” Journal of Data Warehousing, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 13–22, 2000.

S. M. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee, “A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions,” in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017, pp. 4768–4777.

V. Plevris, G. Solorzano, N. P. Bakas, M. A. El, and A. B. Seghier, “Investigation of Performance Metrics in Regression Analysis and Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models,” in 8th European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, 2022.

D. L. Shrestha and D. P. Solomatine, “Machine Learning Approaches for Estimation of Prediction Interval for the Model Output,” Neural Networks, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 225–235, 2006.

A. Khosravi, S. Nahavandi, D. Creighton, and A. F. Atiya, “Lower Upper Bound Estimation Method for Construction of Neural Network-Based Prediction Intervals,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 337–346, 2011.

R. Koenker and G. Bassett, “Regression Quantiles,” Econometrica, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 33–50, 1978.

I. Takeuchi, Q. V. Le, T. D. Sears, and A. J. Smola, “Nonparametric Quantile Estimation,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 7, no. 45, pp. 1231–1264, 2006.

G. Kalvane and A. Kalvans, “Seasonality in the Landscape of Latvia: a Phenological Calendar,” Folia Geographica, vol. 18, pp. 95–103, 2020.

M. R. Raupach, “Simplified Expressions for Vegetation Roughness Length and Zero-Plane Displacement as Functions of Canopy Height and Area Index,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol. 71, pp. 211–216, 1994.

P. Zippenfenig, “Open-Meteo.com Weather API,” 2023, software license: CC-BY-4.0. Available: https://github.com/open-meteo/open-meteo

T. Chen and C. Guestrin, “XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System,” in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016, pp. 785–794.

T. Akiba, S. Sano, T. Yanase, T. Ohta, and M. Koyama, “Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework,” in Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2019, pp. 2623–2631.

Downloads

Published

31.10.2026

How to Cite

Staško, A., Bondarenko, A., Otomers, E., Bļizņuks, D., Birzniece, I., Sirmais, . R., Vēliņš, K. K., & Grundspeņķis, J. (2026). Quantile Regression for Power Grid Damage Prediction. Complex Systems Informatics and Modeling Quarterly, 48, 76-93. https://doi.org/10.7250/csimq.2026-48.04

Funding data