Game-Based Learning Design for Post-Merger Integration Methods: Requirements and Metamodel
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7250/csimq.2025-45.05Keywords:
Post-Merger Integration, IS, Game-Based Learning, Instructional Design, Serious GamesAbstract
Post-merger integration (PMI) presents unique challenges for professionals responsible for information systems’ (IS) integration when aligning and combining diverse system architectures of merging organizations. Although the theoretical and practical guidance exists for PMI on the business level, there is a significant gap in training for IS integration in this context. In prior research, specific methods AMILI (Support method for informed decision identification) and AMILP (Support method for informed decision-making) were introduced for the support of IS integration decisions in PMI. But during the practical application, a high learning curve and low learner motivation were reported. This study examines how game-based learning can transform the training of these methods into a more engaging and motivating experience, tailored to the context of the specific PMI case. Building on instructional design theory, game design theory, cognitive load principles, motivation models, and specifics of the IS integration in the scope of the PMI, the article derives a structured catalogue of requirements for a game-based learning design framework tailored to PMI-specific conditions. Additionally, a metamodel is defined to show how these requirements are systematically transformed into design activities and artefacts, resulting in a consistent learning design process and a corresponding data model aimed at designing a learning experience for IS integration within the scope of a specific PMI. The metamodel’s applicability is demonstrated through instantiations of representative requirements.
References
M. A. Hitt et al., “Creating Value Through Mergers and Acquisitions,” in The Handbook of Mergers and Acquisitions, Oxford University Press, pp. 71–113, 2012. Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601462.003.0004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601462.003.0004
F. Bauer and K. Matzler, “Antecedents of M&A success: The role of strategic complementarity, cultural fit, and degree and speed of integration,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 269–291, 2014. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2091
M. Mehta and R. Hirschheim, “Strategic alignment in mergers and acquisitions: Theorizing IS integration decision making,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 143–174, 2007. Available: https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00118
S. Henningsson and S. Carlsson, “The DySIIM model for managing IS integration in mergers and acquisitions,” Information Systems Journal, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 441–476, 2011. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00374.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00374.x
F. Wijnhoven, T. Spil, R. Stegwee, and R. T. A. Fa, “Post-merger IT integration strategies: An IT alignment perspective,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 5–28, 2006. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2005.07.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2005.07.002
M. Alaranta and S. Henningsson, “An approach to analyzing and planning post-merger IS integration: Insights from two field studies,” Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 307–319, 2008. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9079-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9079-2
M. H. Larsen, “Value Creation through ICT Integration in Merger & Acquisition Processes,” Working Paper, 2005.
S. A. Carlsson and S. Henningsson, “Managing information systems integration in corporate mergers and acquisitions,” in Adaptive Technologies and Business Integration: Social, Managerial and Organizational Dimensions, IGI Global, 2006, pp. 174–188. Available: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-048-6.ch009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-048-6.ch009
K. Lace, “Supporting Information System Integration Decisions in the Post-Merger Context,” Complex Systems Informatics and Modeling Quarterly, no. 34, pp. 30–61, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.7250/csimq.2023-34.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7250/csimq.2023-34.02
C. T. Fosnot, Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice. Teachers College Press, 2005.
A. Y. Kolb and D. A. Kolb, “Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experiential Learning in Higher Education Experience-Based Learning Systems,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 193–212, 2005. Available: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.17268566 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.17268566
J. Herrington and R. Oliver, “Critical characteristics of situated learning: Implications for the instructional design of multimedia,” in ASCILITE, pp. 253–262, 1995.
M. Christie, M. D. Carey, A. Robertson, and P. Grainger, “Putting transformative learning theory into practice,” Australian Journal of Adult Learning, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 9–30, 2015.
J. J. G. van Merriënboer and J. Sweller, “Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 17, pp. 147–177, 2005. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0
O. Chen, F. Paas, and J. Sweller, “A Cognitive Load Theory Approach to Defining and Measuring Task Complexity Through Element Interactivity,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 35, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09782-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09782-w
T. de Jong, “Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought,” Instructional Science, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 105–134, 2010. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0
R. M. Branch, Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer, 2010. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
M. W. Allen and R. Sites, Leaving ADDIE for SAM: An Agile Model for Developing the Best Learning Experiences. American Society for Training & Development, 2012.
J. J. G. van Merriënboer, P. A. Kirschner, and J. Frèrejean, Ten Steps to Complex Learning. Taylor & Francis, 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003322481 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003322481
G. P. Wiggins and J. McTighe, Understanding by Design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2005.
B. J. Fogg, “A Behavior Model for Persuasive Design,” Persuasive’09, pp. 1–7, 2009. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/1541948.1541999 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1541948.1541999
J. S. Eccles and A. Wigfield, “Motivational beliefs, values, and goals,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 53, pp. 109–132, 2002. Available: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior,” Psychological Inquiry, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 227–268, 2000. Available: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
A. K. Przybylski, C. S. Rigby, and R. M. Ryan, “A Motivational Model of Video Game Engagement,” Review of General Psychology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 154–166, 2010. Available: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019440 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019440
J. Nakamura and M. Csikszentmihalyi, “The Concept of Flow,” in Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology, 2014, pp. 239–263. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_16
J.-N. Proulx, M. Romero, and S. Arnab, “Learning Mechanics and Game Mechanics Under the Perspective of Self-Determination Theory to Foster Motivation in Digital Game Based Learning,” Simulation & Gaming, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 81–97, 2017. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878116674399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878116674399
S. Deterding, R. Khaled, L. E. Nacke, and D. Dixon, “Gamification: Toward a Definition,” in CHI 2011 Gamification Workshop Proceedings, 2011.
T. M. Connolly, E. A. Boyle, E. MacArthur, T. Hainey, and J. M. Boyle, “A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games,” Computers & Education, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 661–686, 2012. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004
R. Ibrahim and A. Jaafar, “Educational games (EG) design framework: Combination of game design, pedagogy and content modeling,” in Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics, ICEEI 2009, 2009, pp. 293–298. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEI.2009.5254771 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEI.2009.5254771
A. Merino-Cajaraville, S. Reyes-de-Cózar, and P. Navazo-Ostúa, “SCHEMA: A Process for the Creation and Evaluation of Serious Games – A Systematic Review towards Sustainability,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 16, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612351
D. Avila-Pesantez, R. Delgadillo, and L. A. Rivera, “Proposal of a Conceptual Model for Serious Games Design: A Case Study in Children with Learning Disabilities,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 161017–161033, 2019. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2951380 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2951380
S. H. Culyba, The Transformational Framework: A Process Tool for the Development of Transformational Games. ETC Press, 2018.
R. Hunicke, M. Leblanc, and R. Zubek, “MDA: A Formal Approach to Game Design and Game Research,” in AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI, 2004.
R. E. Ferdig, Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education. IGI Global, 2009. Available: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-808-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-808-6
W. Walk, D. Görlich, and M. Barrett, “Design, dynamics, experience (DDE): An advancement of the MDA framework for game design,” in Game Dynamics, Springer, 2017, pp. 27–45. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53088-8_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53088-8_3
S. Arnab et al., “Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 391–411, 2015. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12113
International Requirements Engineering Board (IREB), CPRE Foundation Level Syllabus, 2.2. 2015.
The International Organization for Standardization and the International Electrotechnical Commission, “ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018 Systems and software engineering – Life cycle processes – Requirements engineering,” 2018.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ksenija Lace (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
