Towards the Framework of Active Ownership of a Public E-Service within Transformational Government
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7250/csimq.2025-45.04Keywords:
Digital Government, E-Government Leadership, Digital Transformation, E-Governance, Digitalization Leadership, E-Services, E-Service Management, Digital ChampionsAbstract
The success factors and challenges of e-government projects are often examined from the perspective of observers who analyze and document the current state of affairs. In most cases, however, no clearly designated entity is identified as responsible for fostering these success factors and mitigating the challenges. To make e-government success influencers more actionable, we propose a framework of active ownership of a public e-service that specifies the responsible entities along with their skills and tasks. The underlying rationale is that a public e-service is more usable and more widely adopted if it has an accountable and engaged owner. In addition to making e-government success factors actionable, the active ownership supports e-services through a “paradigm shift” in the management of e-government engagements: instead of fragmented managerial responsibilities distributed across time-restricted projects, a public e-service receives holistic, lifecycle-long management led by one accountable entity. Moreover, mapping the tasks related to active ownership to the components of transformational government reveals that these tasks align closely with the concepts of public digital transformation.
References
N. O. E. Olsson and G. Berg-Johansen, “Aspects of project ownership in theory and practice,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 100, pp. 790–795, 2016. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.226 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.226
S. Collins, “Project Management: Expectations Set = Expectations Met,” MC Press, 2003. Available: https://mcpressonline.com/career/general/project-management-expectations-set-expectations-met
A. Naqvi, “The Use Case Illusion: Why the Public Sector’s Approach to AI Is Undermining Transformation,” Journal of Generative AI in Public Sector, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12–26, 2025. Available: https://aipost.com/index.php/aipost/article/view/5
P. Liesbrock and E. Sneiders, “Assessing poor adoption of the eID in Germany,” in Information systems and technologies, WorldCIST 2023, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 801, Springer, pp. 292–301, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45648-0_29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45648-0_29
S. Krempl, “E-government study: the digital ID card takes a leap forward,” 2024. Available: https://www.heise.de/en/news/E-government-study-the-digital-ID-card-takes-a-leap-forward-9795371.html
BankID, “BankID in numbers,” 2024. Available: https://www.bankid.com/en/om-oss/statistik
V. Weerakkody, M. Janssen, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “Transformational change and business process reengineering (BPR): Lessons from the British and Dutch public sector,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 320–328, 2011. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.010
E. Sneiders, “Active Ownership as an E-Service Management Practice in Transformational Government,” in Proceedings of the 17th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance, ICEGOV’24, ACM, pp. 97–104, 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3680127.3680153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3680127.3680153
H. F. Hsieh and S. E. Shannon, “Three approaches to qualitative content analysis,” Qualitative Health Research, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1277–1288, 2005. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
E. Sneiders, “Initial framework of active ownership of a public e-service within transformational government,” in Joint Proceedings of the BIR 2025 Workshops and Doctoral Consortium co-located with 24th International Conference on Perspectives in Business Informatics Research (BIR 2025), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pp. 143–156, 2025. Available: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-4034/paper72.pdf
B. Smela, M. Toumi, K. Świerk, C. Francois, M. Biernikiewicz, E. Clay, and L. Boyer, “Rapid literature review: definition and methodology,” Journal of Market Access & Health Policy, vol. 11, no. 1, article 2241234, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2023.2241234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2023.2241234
V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006. Available: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
E. Ziemba, T. Papaj, R. Żelazny, and M. Jadamus-Hacura, “Factors influencing the success of e-government,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 156–167, 2016. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2016.1117378 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2016.1117378
J. Brown and S. M. S. Hoque, “Contract approaches for sustainable community-based access to e-service provision: a comparative study between Bangladesh and the Philippines,” Information Technology for Development, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 48–60, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2022.2091506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2022.2091506
S. Ojha and I. M. Pandey, “Management and financing of e-Government projects in India: Does financing strategy add value?” IIMB Management Review, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 90–108, 2017. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2017.04.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2017.04.002
Axelos, ITIL Foundation. ITIL 4 Edition, 2019. Available: https://abim.go.ug/sites/files/%28ITIL%29%20Axelos%20-%20ITIL%20Foundation%204%20edition-Axelos%20%282019%29%5B1%5D.pdf
M. Kamal, V. Weerakkody, and Z. Irani, “Analyzing the role of stakeholders in the adoption of technology integration solutions in UK local government: An exploratory study,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 200–210, 2011. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.08.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.08.003
A. Anand, P. Seetharaman, and S. D. Vaidya, “Role of project owner in e-government project sustainability,” Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 200–219, 2016. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2016.1255485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2016.1255485
D. J. Neufeld, L. Dong, and C. Higgins, “Charismatic leadership and user acceptance of information technology,” European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 494–510, 2007. Available: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000682 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000682
H. Antonopoulou, C. Halkiopoulos, O. Barlou, and G. N. Beligiannis, “Transformational leadership and digital skills in higher education institutes: during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Emerging Science Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2021. Available: https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2021-01252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2021-01252
M. E. Cook, M. F. LaVigne, C. M. Pagano, S. S. Dawes, and T. A. Pardo, Making a Case for Local E-Government. Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, 2002. Available: https://www.ctg.albany.edu/media/pubs/pdfs/making_a_case.pdf
L. S. Bjerke-Busch and A. Aspelund, “Identifying barriers for digital transformation in the public sector,” in Digitalization. Management for Professionals, Springer, 2021, pp. 277–290. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69380-0_15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69380-0_15
C. Wilson and I. Mergel, “Overcoming barriers to digital government: mapping the strategies of digital champions,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 2, article 101681, 2022. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101681 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101681
M. Möhring, B. Keller, R. Schmidt, K. Sandkuhl, and A. Zimmermann, “Digitalization and enterprise architecture management: a perspective on benefits and challenges,” SN Business & Economics, vol. 3, article 46, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-023-00426-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-023-00426-3
N. Lafioune, A. Desmarest, É. A. Poirier, and M. St-Jacques, “Digital transformation in municipalities for the planning, delivery, use and management of infrastructure assets: Strategic and organizational framework,” Sustainable Futures, vol. 6, article 100119, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2023.100119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2023.100119
A. F. Van Veenstra, B. Klievink, and M. Janssen, “Barriers and impediments to transformational government: insights from literature and practice,” Electronic Government, an International Journal, vol. 8, no. 2–3, pp. 226–241, 2011. Available: https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2011.039838 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2011.039838
R. W. Schwester, “Examining the barriers to e-government adoption,” Electronic Journal of e-Government, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 113–122, 2009. Available: https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejeg/article/view/494
A. Savoldelli, C. Codagnone, and G. Misuraca, “Understanding the e-government paradox: Learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoption,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 31, pp. S63–S71, 2014. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.008
B. Distel, “Assessing citizens’ non-adoption of public e-services in Germany,” Information Polity, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 339–360, 2020. Available: https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-190214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-190214
D. F. Norris and M. J. Moon, “Advancing e‐government at the grassroots: Tortoise or hare?” Public Administration Review, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 64–75, 2005. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00431.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00431.x
E. Sørensen and J. Torfing, “Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector,” Administration & Society, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 842–868, 2011. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711418768 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711418768
L. Glyptis, M. Christofi, D. Vrontis, M. Del Giudice, S. Dimitriou, and P. Michael, “E-Government implementation challenges in small countries: The project manager’s perspective,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 152, article 119880, 2020. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119880 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119880
S. Goel, R. Dwivedi, and A. Sherry, “Role of key stakeholders in successful e-governance programs: Conceptual framework,” in Proceedings of AMCIS 2012, Association for Information Systems (AIS), 2012.
S. Wang and M. K. Feeney, “Determinants of information and communication technology adoption in municipalities,” The American Review of Public Administration, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 292–313, 2014. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014553462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014553462
Better Regulation Guidelines, Commission Staff Working Document, European Commission, 2021. Available: https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/d0bbd77f-bee5-4ee5-b5c4-6110c7605476_en
A. Reinwald and P. Kraemmergaard, “Managing stakeholders in transformational government – A case study in a Danish local government,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 133–141, 2012. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.007
A. Meijer, “E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategies,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 198–206, 2015. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001
J. A. Nielsen, K. T. Elmholdt, and M. S. Noesgaard, “Leading digital transformation: A narrative perspective,” Public Administration Review, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 589–603, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13721 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13721
N. S. Mphahlele, R. M. Kekwaletswe, and T. R. Seaba, “Model to explain use of E-Government service change: Use of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and information systems success model to explain use of E-Government service change: Emerging market case,” Telematics and Informatics Reports, vol. 17, article 100190, 2025. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2025.100190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2025.100190
M. I. Arfeen, J. Iqbal, and M. J. Mushtaq, “Model for e-Government implementation in Pakistan,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV), ACM, 2017, pp. 57–61. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3047273.3047372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3047273.3047372
L. Rusu, P. B. L. Balasuriya, and O. Bah, “Cultural barriers in digital transformation in a public organization: A case study of a Sri-Lankan organization,” in Proceedings of Information Systems, EMCIS’20, Lecture notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 402, Springer, pp. 640–656, 2020. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63396-7_43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63396-7_43
M. E. Putri, D. I. Sensuse, M. Mishbah, and P. Prima, “E-government inter-organizational integration: Types and success factors,” in Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on software engineering and information management, ICSIM’20, ACM, 2020, pp. 216–221. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3378936.3378955 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3378936.3378955
I. Scott and T. Gong, “Coordinating government silos: challenges and opportunities,” in Global Public Policy and Governance, vol. 1, pp. 20–38, 2021. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-021-00004-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-021-00004-z
N. Teofilovic, “The reality of innovation in government,” The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1–19, 2002.
R. C. Box, G. S. Marshall, B. J. Reed, and C. M. Reed, “New public management and substantive democracy,” Public Administration Review, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 608–619, 2001. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00131
S. C. Y. Luk, “The impact of leadership and stakeholders on the success/failure of e-government service: Using the case study of e-stamping service in Hong Kong,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 594–604, 2009. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.02.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.02.009
V. Pandey and S. Gupta, “Understanding G2G e-government project impasse: A stakeholder theory perspective,” Information Development, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 361–374, 2016. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666916657582 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666916657582
A. Yiannakou, “Urban regeneration as a perpetual planning process: Understanding the role of stakeholders in property-led regeneration projects in Greek cities,” Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 83–104, 2020. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094220914470 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094220914470
W. Nallaperuma-Arachchige, C. Hadiwattege, and N. D. Hulathdoowage, “Conflicts with external stakeholders in irrigation construction projects in Sri Lanka: a narrative analysis,” International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 23, no. 15, pp. 2570–2582, 2023. Available https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2022.2077684 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2022.2077684
S. Abdurahman and S. Kabanda, “Factors influencing the design and implementation of accessible e‐Government services in South Africa,” The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, vol. 90, no. 4, article e12317, 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12317
F. N. S. Palma, “Interoperability Challenges and Critical Success Factors in the Deployment of Cross-border Digital Medical Prescriptions in Finland and Estonia,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Digital Health (ICDH), IEEE, pp. 60–65, 2022. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDH55609.2022.00018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDH55609.2022.00018
K. Layne and J. Lee, “Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 122–136, 2001. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1
R. Amoako, Y. Jiang, S. S. Adu-Yeboah, M. F. Frempong, and S. Tetteh, “Factors influencing electronic human resource management implementation in public organisations in an emerging economy: An empirical study,” South African Journal of Business Management, vol. 54, no. 1, article a2937, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v54i1.2937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v54i1.2937
C. A. Méndez-Rivera, O. N. Patiño-Toro, A. Valencia-Arias, and D. M. Arango-Botero, “Factors influencing the adoption of E-government services: a study among university students,” Economies, vol. 11, no. 9, article 225, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11090225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11090225
J. Rowley, “e-Government stakeholders – Who are they and what do they want?” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 53–62, 2011. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.05.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.05.005
F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989. Available: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
N. P. Rana, M. D. Williams, Y. K. Dwivedi, and J. Williams, “Theories and theoretical models for examining the adoption of e-government services,” e-Service Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 26–56, 2012. Available: https://doi.org/10.2979/eservicej.8.2.26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/eservicej.8.2.26
O. Haughton and D. Barnes, “A Comparative Analysis of E-Government in Jamaica and Singapore: An Exploratory Study of Supply-Side Factors,” Journal of Global Information Technology Management, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 116–144, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2023.2200395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2023.2200395
C. Sanmukhiya and B. Roopchand, “E-government Non-adoption in the Republic of Mauritius,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences (SHSS), pp. 55–62, 2016.
S. Van de Walle, Z. Zeibote, S. Stacenko, T. Muravska, and K. Migchelbrink, “Explaining non-adoption of electronic government services by citizens: A study among non-users of public e-services in Latvia,” Information Polity, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 399–409, 2018. Available: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170069
L. A. Kappelman, R. McKeeman, and L. Zhang, “Early warning signs of IT project failure: The dominant dozen,” Information Systems Management, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 31–36, 2006. Available: https://doi.org/10.1201/1078.10580530/46352.23.4.20060901/95110.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/1078.10580530/46352.23.4.20060901/95110.4
L. Watkowski, A. Drechsler, and S Hönigsberg, “Fostering the Adoption of Smart E-Government Services in Germany,” in AMCIS 2023 Proceedings, Association for Information Systems (AIS), article 3, 2023.
X. Huang, “The roles of competition on innovation efficiency and firm performance: Evidence from the Chinese manufacturing industry,” European Research on Management and Business Economics, vol. 29, no. 1, article 100201, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2022.100201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2022.100201
M. Polder and E. Veldhuizen, “Innovation and competition in the Netherlands: Testing the inverted-U for industries and firms,” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, vol. 12, pp. 67–91, 2012. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-011-0120-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-011-0120-7
Å. Grönlund, “Electronic identity management in Sweden: governance of a market approach,” Identity in the Information Society, vol. 3, pp. 195–211, 2010. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12394-010-0043-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12394-010-0043-1
A. Sabani, V. Thai, and M. A. Hossain, “Factors affecting citizen adoption of E-government in developing countries: an exploratory case study from Indonesia,” Journal of Global Information Management, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.318131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.318131
N. Marangunić and A. Granić, “Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013,” Universal Access in the Information Society, vol. 14, pp. 81–95, 2015. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
D. Belanche, L. V. Casaló, C. Flavián, and J. Schepers, “Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services,” Information & Management, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 627–640, 2014. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.05.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.05.016
M. Mpinganjira, “Use of e-government services: the role of trust,” International Journal of Emerging Markets, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 622–633, 2015. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-12-2013-0151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-12-2013-0151
P. Papadopoulou, M. Nikolaidou, and D. Martakos, “What is trust in e-government? A proposed typology,” in Proceedings of 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS’10, IEEE, 2010, pp. 1–10. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.491
E. Sneiders, L. Gunawardena, S. Rutabayiro Ngoga, R. Darayathna, and J. C. Byungura, “Potential for improving public services by exploring citizens’ communication to public organizations,” in International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia, EGOSE’18, Springer, 2019, pp. 265–280. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13283-5_20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13283-5_20
M. Warkentin, D. Gefen, P. A. Pavlou, and G. M. Rose, “Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust,” Electronic Markets, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 157–162, 2002. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/101967802320245929 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/101967802320245929
C. G. Reddick and M. Turner, “Channel choice and public service delivery in Canada: Comparing e-government to traditional service delivery,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2012. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.03.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.03.005
A. Mazhar, F. Iradat, N. Taşkın, and B. Metin, “Digital trust and the adoption of e-government services in Pakistan: a systematic literature review,” Security Journal, vol. 38, article 58, 2025. Available: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-025-00506-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-025-00506-z
I. Mergel, N. Edelmann, and N. Haug, “Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 4, article 101385, 2019. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
C. H. Tsai and J. Zdravkovic, “A survey of roles and responsibilities in digital business ecosystems,” in Proceedings of the Forum at Practice of Enterprise Modeling 2020 co-located with the 13th IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference on the Practice of Enterprise Modeling (PoEM 2020), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2793, 2020, pp. 44–53. Available: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2793/paper5.pdf
O.-R. Lobonţ, S. Vătavu, L. Jicărean, and N.-C. Moldovan, “A cross-cultural study on the digitalisation of public services,” in The New Digital Era: Digitalisation, Emerging Risks and Opportunities, 2022, pp. 69–88. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-37592022000109A005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-37592022000109A005
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Eriks Sneiders, Petteri Silvanto (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
